Skip to Content
Ground PotentializingOverview

Ground-Potentialising — Sensing Zaria

Purpose: Explains field research goals, leaderboard system, and how individual vs team sensing works.


🌍 What is Ground-Potentialising?

Ground-Potentialising means going into the place — meeting people, listening, and collecting evidence before building.

This section captures individual and team field work and rewards those who gather deep local insight.

Why It Matters

  • 🎯 Real problems come from real people, not assumptions
  • 📊 Evidence-based solutions are more likely to succeed
  • 🤝 Community trust is built through listening, not telling
  • 🏆 Quality research is recognized and rewarded

🎯 Key Goals

1. Listen to Local People and Record Real Problems

What this means:

  • Spend time in the community observing and asking questions
  • Talk to people affected by the problem, not just experts
  • Document what you hear in their own words (quotes)
  • Understand context: why does this problem exist? What have people already tried?

Not acceptable:

  • ❌ Assumptions based on what you think the problem is
  • ❌ Solutions looking for problems
  • ❌ Interviewing only your friends or family

2. Gather Evidence for Every Meaningful Discovery

Minimum requirements for each field visit:

  • 3 photos — showing the problem context, people, place
  • 3 quotes — direct statements from people affected
  • Short video (60-120 seconds) OR audio recording with transcript

Why this matters:

  • Evidence proves you did the work
  • Photos and quotes make your story compelling
  • Video/audio captures tone and context that text misses

3. Turn Insights into Problem Statements and Prototypes

The progression:

  1. Field research → Collect evidence and quotes
  2. Synthesis → Identify patterns and root causes
  3. Problem statement → Clear articulation of who, what, where, why
  4. Prototype idea → Testable solution based on insights

Example progression:

  • Field research: “Vendors say drains block every 2 days”
  • Synthesis: Waste collection is individual, expensive, inconsistent
  • Problem statement: “200+ vendors lack affordable collective waste collection”
  • Prototype: Shared collection drum with micro-payment system

🏆 Leaderboards & Incentives

Points are awarded for quality field research and documentation:

Point Categories

  • 📸 Evidence uploads — Photos, videos, audio with proper captions
  • 📝 Pull Requests (PRs) — Submitted documentation
  • 🎤 Presentations — Sharing learnings at events
  • 💬 Quality quotes — Direct, specific, attributed statements
  • Consent documentation — Proper ethical practices

See the Incentives page for detailed point values and prizes.

What Gets Rewarded

High points:

  • ✅ Deep, specific insights from multiple sources
  • ✅ Evidence showing real people in real contexts
  • ✅ Proper consent documentation
  • ✅ Honest reflection on what you learned

Low/no points:

  • ❌ Generic observations without evidence
  • ❌ Staged photos or fake quotes
  • ❌ Missing consent
  • ❌ Copying others’ work

📋 Quick Start Checklist

Before your first field visit:

After your field visit:

  • Upload photos to Drive immediately
  • Transcribe quotes while fresh in your memory
  • Document consent (who agreed, what they agreed to)
  • Write your reflection (200-300 words)
  • Submit via the upload form

💡 Tips for Effective Field Research

Before You Go

  • Research the context — What’s already known about this problem?
  • Prepare questions — Open-ended, not yes/no
  • Bring consent forms — Get permission before recording
  • Go with a partner — Safer and you can compare notes

During Your Visit

  • Observe first — Spend 15-30 minutes just watching
  • Ask “why” and “how” — Not just “what”
  • Record exact words — Don’t paraphrase quotes
  • Take contextual photos — Show the place, not just close-ups
  • Note what surprises you — Assumptions that were wrong

After Your Visit

  • Upload immediately — Don’t lose photos or forget details
  • Reflect honestly — What did you learn? What confused you?
  • Share with team — Discuss patterns and insights
  • Follow up if needed — Sometimes you need a second visit

🤝 Ethical Field Research

  • ✅ Explain who you are and what you’re doing
  • ✅ Ask permission before taking photos or recording
  • ✅ Offer anonymity if people prefer
  • ✅ Show people what you captured (if possible)
  • ✅ Document their consent

Respect and Reciprocity

  • Respect people’s time — Keep interviews to 10-15 minutes unless they want to talk longer
  • Give back — Share your findings, offer to help if you can
  • Be honest — Don’t make promises you can’t keep
  • Protect privacy — Don’t share identifying information without permission

See Regenerative Development Principles for more on ethical engagement.


📊 Quality Standards

Good Field Research

Specific and detailed

  • “Vendors spend 30-45 minutes daily sweeping plastic from their stalls”

Multiple perspectives

  • Interviewed vendors, customers, waste collectors, market manager

Evidence-backed

  • Photos show the problem, quotes explain impact, video demonstrates scale

Poor Field Research

  • ❌ Vague: “The market has a waste problem”
  • ❌ Single source: Only talked to one person
  • ❌ No evidence: Just descriptions, no photos or quotes


Ready to start? Fill the [Intake Form] and upload your first field evidence to [Drive] today!

Questions? Check the FAQ or ask in the community channel.

Last updated on